Philana Holmes
McDonaldâs and a franchise holder are at fault after a hot Chicken McNugget from a Happy Meal fell on a little girlâs leg and caused second-degree burns, a jury in South Florida found in a case reminiscent of the famous hot coffee lawsuit of the 1990s.
A second jury will determine how much McDonaldâs USA and its franchise owner, Upchurch Foods, will pay the child and her mother, the South Florida SunSentinel reported.
Thursdayâs decision was split, with jurors finding the franchise holder liable for negligence and failure to warn customers about the risk of hot food, and McDonaldâs USA liable for failing to provide instructions for safe handling of the food. McDonaldâs USA was not found to be negligent, and the jury dismissed the argument that the product was defective.
âOur sympathies go out to this family for what occurred in this unfortunate incident, as we hold customer safety as one of our highest priorities,â McDonaldâs owner-operator Brent Upchurch said in a statement. âWe are deeply disappointed with todayâs verdict because the facts show that our restaurant in Tamarac, Florida did indeed follow those protocols when cooking and serving this Happy Meal.â
Jurors heard two days of testimony and arguments about the 2019 episode that left the 4-year-old girl with a burned upper thigh.
Philana Holmes testified that she bought Happy Meals for her son and then-4-year-old daughter at a drive-thru window at a McDonaldâs in Tamarac, near Fort Lauderdale, the SunSentinel reported. She handed the food to her children, who were in the back seat.
After she drove away, her daughter started screaming. The mother testified she didnât know what was wrong until she pulled over to help the girl, Olivia Caraballo, who is now 7, the newspaper reported. She saw the burn on the girlâs leg and took photos on her iPhone, which included audio clips of the childâs screams.
The sound of the girlâs screams were played in court. The child, who is autistic, did not testify, the newspaper reported.
Lawyers for McDonaldâs noted that the food had to be hot to avoid salmonella poisoning, and that the nuggets were not meant to be pressed between a seat belt and human flesh for more than two minutes.
The girlâs parents sued, saying that McDonaldâs and the franchise owner failed to adequately train employees, failed to warn customers about the âdangerousâ temperature of the food, and for cooking the food to a much higher temperature than necessary.
While both sides agreed the nugget caused the burns, the familyâs lawyers argued the temperature was above 200 degrees (93 Celsius), while the defense said it was no more than 160 degrees (71 Celsius).
The case is likely to stoke memories of the McDonaldâs coffee lawsuit of the 1990s, which became an urban legend of sorts about seemingly frivolous lawsuits, even though a jury and judge had found it anything but.
A New Mexico jury awarded Stella Liebeck, 81, $2.7 million in punitive damages after she was scalded in 1992 by hot coffee from McDonaldâs that spilled onto her lap, burning her legs, groin and buttocks, as she tried to steady the cup with her legs while prying the lid off to add cream outside a drive-thru.
She suffered third-degree burns and spent more than a week in the hospital.
She had initially asked McDonaldâs for $20,000 to cover hospital expenses, but the company went to trial. A judge later reduced the $2.7 million award to $480,000, which he said was appropriate for the âwillful, wanton, recklessâ and âcallousâ behavior by McDonaldâs.
AP
Qatar Secures Place Among the World's Top 10 Wealthiest Nations
Hamad International Airport Witnesses Record Increase in Passenger Traffic
Saudi Arabia: Any visa holder can now perform Umrah
What are Qatar's Labour Laws on Annual Leave?
Leave a comment